- Project Flux
- Posts
- Manus: The first general multi-agent AI
Manus: The first general multi-agent AI
Are we in for another DeepSeek moment?

For the second time this year, China have stormed AI virality with a glimpse into Manus - the first general multi-agent AI. Simply put, an AI which can do many tasks that are typically distinct simultaneously. While, not much has been shared on Manus, it’s another step into a future shaped by autonomous agents. Emerging from the heart of China's vibrant tech ecosystem, Manus, developed by Monica.IM, has quickly captured imaginations with its audacious promise: “Get everything done while you rest.” The buzz is palpable, showcasing the AI independently planning travel itineraries and executing comprehensive stock market analyses, suggesting an intriguing step beyond human augmentation towards deeper autonomy. Let’s have a look at its features.
Key features
Autonomous Task Execution: Manus AI can independently perform complex tasks such as report writing, data analysis, and content generation without human intervention.
Multi-Modal Capabilities: It processes and generates various types of data, including text, images, and code, making it versatile for different applications.
Advanced Tool Integration: Manus AI integrates with external tools like web browsers, code editors, and database management systems, enabling it to fetch real-time information and automate workflows efficiently.
Adaptive Learning: The AI learns from user interactions, optimising its processes to provide personalised and efficient responses over time.
Here’s Manus in action:
今天被Manus刷屏。通过制定不同的agent(工作流)不断的被llm调用,然后执行各种各样的工作任务。其实本质上依然是一个人缝合怪,但是的确做的非常漂亮。
对于大部分普通人来说,在庞大的agent工作室里面找到一个适合自己来进行工作的难度是不小的。Manus很好的解决了这个问题。… x.com/i/web/status/1…
— Leon.Y (@StlightLeon)
7:56 AM • Mar 6, 2025
Autonomy in Action: A Leap Forward
Unlike most existing AI platforms, which typically assist humans through incremental suggestions or repetitive tasks, Manus is designed to independently navigate complex challenges. Leveraging a multi-agent architecture, it breaks down major objectives into manageable subtasks, autonomously assigning resources and executing actions. Real-world demonstrations as shown in their use case gallery, include independently planning comprehensive itineraries or managing multi-step marketing campaigns. These diverse use-cases underscore its potential for significant productivity gains in structured project management environments.
Yet, embracing such autonomy isn't without its complexities. The very independence that makes Manus compelling also invites critical reflection on the necessary balance between machine execution and human oversight. As Manus assumes tasks traditionally reserved for project managers, analysts, or even junior consultants, it challenges organisations to reconsider where to draw the boundary between automated efficiency and essential human guidance.
Personalisation and Contextual Intelligence
Manus isn't merely autonomous; it's claimed contextual intelligence. It remembers preferences, patterns, and nuances across interactions. This allows it to anticipate and adapts to user behaviours and preferences. This deep personalisation enhances its efficacy, turning routine automation into meaningful, tailored collaboration.
In project-oriented industries—construction, software development, consulting—this could represent an evolutionary shift. Project delivery could become increasingly seamless, as Manus anticipates project managers’ needs and independently undertakes routine, structured workflows. Imagine AI proactively managing scheduling risks in construction projects or autonomously drafting and debugging code—freeing human collaborators to focus deeply on strategy, innovation, and complex decision-making. What’s more, imagine this happening simultaneously…
Potential Ethical and Industry Challenges
With autonomy brings important ethical considerations. Chief among these are potential job displacement and workforce disruption. As Manus and similar systems assume greater roles, how do we balance efficiency gains with preserving meaningful human work? Organisations must engage strategically, retraining their workforce and clarifying human roles in an AI-augmented reality. For us, it’s to use AI augmentation to evolve our meta-cognition, thinking how to think better.
While Manus’ capabilities appear transformative, there are valid concerns. Initial technical transparency has been limited, prompting justified calls for deeper validation beyond controlled benchmarks. Furthermore, early demonstrations, while promising, suggest Manus performs best when objectives are clearly defined. Ambiguous or highly creative problems still rely heavily on human intuition and oversight.
Bridging East and West: Contrasting AI Philosophies
From a systemic perspective, Manus highlights a fundamental divergence between Chinese and Western AI philosophies. China appears comfortable pushing aggressively towards autonomy, emphasising rapid deployment and tangible productivity benefits. In contrast, Western approaches, exemplified by organisations like OpenAI and Microsoft, generally prioritise careful augmentation and collaborative human-AI interactions, mindful of ethical considerations and cautious regulatory environments.
Yet, these distinctions aren't absolute. There’s growing evidence of convergence: Western companies cautiously explore more autonomous capabilities, while Chinese enterprises, aware of ethical implications, introduce human oversight where necessary. Ultimately, both sides recognise the immense productivity potential that autonomous agents promise—but differ on the pathways and pace of adoption.
Strategic Reflections: Towards Human-Centric AI Integration
Manus is more than technological excitement; it invites thoughtful reflection on our evolving relationship with technology itself. The key strategic challenge now is defining what tasks we entrust fully to autonomous agents and what responsibilities remain fundamentally human—requiring ethical judgement, creative insights, and nuanced decision-making.
For professionals, particularly within structured, project-based roles, the rise of Manus signals an imperative shift: the future belongs to those who master the art of human-AI collaboration. Rather than replacing humans, Manus could redefine the very nature of human work—freeing professionals from routine execution to focus on strategic depth, innovation, and meaningful human engagement.
In essence, Manus doesn't merely reflect China's ambition or technological progress; it underscores a shared global opportunity to rethink the systemic relationship between humanity and artificial intelligence. As we navigate this new frontier, the guiding question becomes clear: How can we integrate autonomous agents like Manus not only to amplify productivity but to elevate human potential itself?